I picked up a 50ct. box of 160 Nosler Accubonds, but I am hesitant to burn off the powder and projectiles on workup when all I have is 50 bullets. But I really want to find a bullet inside the one hundred sixty class that my older rifle likes.
H4831SC Powder readily available in stock now. Ballistically, this Severe Extruded powder is the precise copy of H4831. Bodily, it has a shorter grain dimensions, for that reason, the designation SC or brief Lower. The shorter, extra compact kernels enable the powder to stream in the powder actions much more effortlessly, assisting to relieve the regular reducing of granules.
The fact that the H4831 is in truth a slower burning powder is precisely why you're seeing better velocities acquired with that powder, in contrast to Whatever you've observed Using the IMR stuff. Also excellent powder, but rather much better suited to marginally lesser cases which has a bit less ability.
243, and several of the loads I've began with include, you guessed it, H-4831sc. This time I'm going to shoot the IMR7828 loads 1st, accompanied by the W780 loads just so there won't be any surprises if the H-4831sc loads present a shotgun sample! Who appreciates, I just may locate a use for it In fact.
My knowledge is that the SC and SSC loaded to exactly the same excess weight as the prolonged Lower shows a reduced velocity.
Did you ever check out H4831sc in you 300wsm and 215 bergers. I've a 300wsm now. Capturing 180g with H4350 at 2940fps with regular chamber. Wondering What to anticipate with 215 h4831 vs h4831sc bergers with H4331sc?
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Have a very minimal source of Varget, and a good deal far more accessible H4831SC. I shoot 55 gr. loads Nearly exclusively, since that is certainly exactly what the rifles shoot the top.
excaliber claimed: I've found the precise reverse being genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with one hundred eighty g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and Similarly exact powder in my three hundred Gain Mag.
Any load data to help that? My to start with believed is it isn't really likely to burn off all the way and velocities is going to be gradual and everywhere. May very well be a good fireworks Show!
Why would I mention h4831sc this? Precisely what is my point? I am unsure that there's a authentic valid point in addition to what on earth is common with most has not been well-known with me in the slightest degree in these situations. Do I just Have a very powder jinx or a little something? Simply to demonstrate how outrageous I really am, tomorrow I am range screening a close friends new .
If there is no load data it truly is because this powder is just not appropriate for this cartridge. Ordinarily 1 will not likely find one particular powder to suit all cartridges, and also the relatives of cartridges with The actual powder (4831SC) that you are asking about isn't going to do the job. Click to increase...
It has been a little bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to test. Located a node and shot some teams. I shot a .six 5 shot group currently. It can be a little slower than H1000, but shoots great. Many thanks for the recommendation, It truly is fantastic to understand that I have got selections when 1 or the opposite powder is dried up.
rayporter claimed: i never ever seen a difference in addition to the common is like rolling cordwood onto the the pan. Simply click to grow...
Needless to say, sitting close h4831 vs h4831sc to for 20+ many years (I realize a guy who continues to be using the H4831 he bought in the 60s), means that melt away fees will most likely adjust a smidge, and new manufacture stuff will be somewhat different too.